Online Arguments

1. I decided to choose this Online Argument as it is recent and shows how to mainstream players for a national sport that represents themselves and the teams they play for show no regard when talking smack to each other not caring about any consequences.

2. Three bad examples of the online argument I can talk about is the 1) Direct shots at one another, being straight forward and personally attacking the person themselves and not the organization. 2) The wording being used in it with cuss words and threats of fighting. 3) That these two represent big organizations that they have an effect on when tweeting out stuff like this.

3. As this is child's play of argumenting the 5 rules I would make would be. They have to be formal, cannot take personal attacks at an individual, proper and appropriate grammar, constructive approach, and that they approach in a appropriate sense.